helpful for sure but we also must recognize that, embedded in algorithms, are all the kinds of interpretive judgments that are associated with journalism...are these judgements made explicitly? shared by journalists? etc - my sense is that journalists (like all `users` need to see themselves as partners in all the analytic-interpretive steps)
To get content containing either thought or leadership enter:
To get content containing both thought and leadership enter:
To get content containing the expression thought leadership enter:
You can enter several keywords and you can refine them whenever you want. Our suggestion engine uses more signals but entering a few keywords here will rapidly give you great content to curate.
helpful for sure but we also must recognize that, embedded in algorithms, are all the kinds of interpretive judgments that are associated with journalism...are these judgements made explicitly? shared by journalists? etc - my sense is that journalists (like all `users` need to see themselves as partners in all the analytic-interpretive steps)
In Data Journalism Algorithms are not Enough