The class I teach is called “Story,” and the first assignment was to give a “TEDette.” I defined the project as a five minute talk using a personal story to make an audience care about a scientific...
Via José Carlos
Get Started for FREE
Sign up with Facebook Sign up with X
I don't have a Facebook or a X account
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Maria Jose Vitorino's curator insight,
August 25, 2013 7:44 PM
We are visually wired: It only takes us 150 milliseconds for a symbol to be processed and just 100 milliseconds to attach a meaning to it.
Juliana Loh's curator insight,
August 26, 2013 3:47 AM
Hans. This link is interesting because i read another article recently that mentioned that inaccurate info presented in infographic style is very rarely questioned. The 'more beautiful' the infographic the more it is deemed valid.
Juliana Loh's comment,
August 30, 2013 2:51 AM
Yes. There is a difference. I wish i had that link. I can't find it now but on the other hand, info presented by advertising companies often are the target of skepticism. http://mashable.com/2013/07/03/infographic-advertising-do-you-buy-it/ tho yes.. according to a study done on UX presentation, generally people are far more liable to accept info presented in a graphic form.
|
|